Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

After This, I Shut Up For a While. I Swear.

  • Aug. 9th, 2005 at 10:50 PM
2009 set: Happy!
I give up. What I wanted to say, but didn't have the time, understanding or skills for is all contained here.

As I finished reading this article, I felt a giant roar of "THAT'S RIGHT! RHAAAA!" welling up inside me. I used to spend a lot of time howling to Phil about "Why do the Manga artists get away with this kind of blatant wish-fulfillment stuff when I feel guilty about it every step of the way?!" For that matter, I see Harry Potter stuff as the same kind of blatant wish-fulfillment, but nobody's called him a Mary Sue when I've been listening.

Believe it or not, I went to college. Yes, I did. Where I was taught that certain types of art are derivative and masturbatory and therefore unworthy. Writing comics automatically puts you in the dirt pile (unless you're Art Spiegelman) but that aside, writing a story where your character is a pretty blonde girl genius who is the mysterious heir to the legendary vanished heroes and the prince is madly in love with her and oh, yeah, she's got a magic talking cat...

Well, according to my training, I believe I'm expected to commit some kind of exotic ritual suicide.

But really, I spent a lot of years not writing anything at all because nothing that seemed fun ever passed my sneer test. Well, to Hell with that. I finally read enough stories, popular professional stories, where other authors were getting away with what I considered literary murder and having a wonderful time doing it. I felt like a five-year-old forced to watch other children wallow in birthday cake while being told that I should feel superior because I was better than them for not eating sweets. Finally, the impotent rage broke me, and I'm learning to be shameless now. No more worrying that the latest story idea that makes my toes curl with happiness is too self-serving.  My new motto is "No Fear." And I always recall the advice that James Ernest (Cheapass Games, and more awards than he can fit on his piano) gave me long ago, which was along the lines of "Make what you want. There will be other people out there who also want that, and you can sell it to them."

He's a smart man, that James Ernest.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
[info]drgnmaster wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 06:27 am (UTC)
Pick up a Marvel or DC comic sometime and you really will see literary murder. And yes, as Dava will admit I do buy DC/Marvel comics. I'm a bit picky aobut some of the ones I read though.

Batman as a psycho ninja, paranoid against everyone. X-Men coming back so often that it's become a joke, and now Bucky (dead since the 60s) has come back as well. I honestly think the last good books I read was Angel & the Agpe or Stanley & His Monster.

Oh, and Phil needs to blackmail someone into letting him do more comics for MythAdventures.
[info]spazz_bot wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 06:32 am (UTC)
He's a very wise man that Mr.Ernest.
[info]furrymouse wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 06:33 am (UTC)
Hooray for self-confidence! Hey, as long as you're having fun, fark what others think? Most people who whine the most about poor characters or crappy artwork can't write or draw to save their life. On a side note, I've been thinking about doing an oil painting sometime of Agatha. Whom would I talk with or contact to see if it was all right to do such a thing?
[info]neonnurse wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 06:45 am (UTC)
Here's a little snippet from a story I wrote in defense of Mary Sue, called Portrait of the Artist as a Young Fan:

"I came to see if I could help you understand why people--fanfic readers and writers--react to you the way they tend to do."

This gave Mary Sue pause, and she toyed unconsciously with the jeweled clasp of her cape. "Do you...really know? Can you explain how come characters all love me, but everyone else hates me?" Her lovely wide eyes glimmered with tears. "Even the people who write me try to deny I exist!"

"Well, this is just my opinion," warned the Writer. "But I think maybe it's because just about every Writer who ever turned out to be worth five minutes of a reader's time started out with you. So you're like a security blanket--once kids outgrow them, they're embarrassed by the whole concept of ever having used one. Until they get old enough for nostalgia, that is."


It's a little in-jokey, as a story, but I feel like the concept holds up fairly well. http://www.neonnurse.net/marysue.htm
[info]ronald_mack wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 06:46 am (UTC)
I'd rather read about your Mary Sue than any other.

... compliment, I think.
[info]littlecrow wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 06:55 am (UTC)
*Applauds Wildly*

Hyeah! Dot's Right! Hyu Tell 'Em!
[info]davidgoldfarb wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 06:55 am (UTC)
The really annoying qualities of a Mary Sue were touched on only briefly in the linked article: Mary Sue is all-wise and all-competent, and she is loved and/or admired instantly by everyone she meets. (Except for the villains, who fear her.)

Agatha has none of these qualities. She's a person, the people around her are people (including the constructs) and they interact accordingly.
[info]cerusee wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 07:09 am (UTC)
I got over my Mary-Sue phobia years ago. My one and only caveat regarding Mary-Sues, wish fulfillment characters, and authorial avatars is that they can pose the risk of being so personally tailored to the author's psyche as to be inaccessible to the audience. Watch out for that; find some way of making sure that other people can share the joy of the fun inside your head, instead of just boggling at it. Or accept that some people never will share it, I suppose. (Me? I was the right age for Wesley Crusher, back in the days of Star Trek: The Next Generation, and I don't give a good goddamn whether or not he was a Sue or a Stu or everything his creator wanted to be. He was my avatar, and I understood him, and I wanted to marry him like nobody's business. A lot of little girl geeks my age did.)

But anyway, who doesn't love a Cordelia Vorkosigan?
[info]mearn4d10 wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 01:57 pm (UTC)
All hail the matriarch of the Vorkosigan Clan!
(no subject) - [info]solan_t - Aug. 10th, 2005 02:35 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]jackytar - Nov. 23rd, 2007 05:56 am (UTC) Expand
[info]sabledrake wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 07:32 am (UTC)
My first-ever fanfic, way back before I even knew there was such an animal (I was 12), was a painfully embarrassing LOTR Mary Sue fic. Since then, through millions of words of fanfic and original fiction, I like to think I've gotten pretty much past it. I could list some examples, I guess, and the funny part is that I bet my readers would list a few more that I personally wouldn't consider guilty of Sueism.

But I've never really been much of a one for including myself in stories anyway, idealized or not. Or playing RPG characters based on me (I'm looking at you, Villains and Vigilantes, which said so right in the part on character creation). I'm in this to escape my real life, thanks much.

Nor have I ever been a big fan of the uber-wonderful can-do-anything character. My husband grew up idolizing James Bond, Sherlock Holmes, and Captain Kirk ... all of whom make me sick to my stomach. I recently had to quit reading The Count of Monte Cristo because it did what I thought was the impossible -- the title character was even more cloyingly, grossly, overwhelmingly Mary Sue than was D'Artagnan. Urk!

Really just rambling here, but I've enjoyed reading about your voyage of discovery through the wonderful world of Sue.

-- Christine
[info]archangelbeth wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 11:55 am (UTC)
Long and long ago, I wrote a Mary Sue self-insert. Mind, it was a self-insert into an entirely fictional book, so I think I get some minor points for originality. However, years later, I excerpted certain elements of the magic systems used, wrote those up with examples from plucky little Marie-Susan (and other names changed to protect the guilty), and got paid for it.

I consider this a cackling triumph.

If you make it work so no one knows, then gloat. (Besides, Agatha has various scary pipples after her, and she's human, and she rants. I don't think good little Mary Sues are allowed to rant.)

...besides, some of us are madly in love with the prince, so we're all doing that self-identification thing. (Maybe that's what differentiates a Sue from a non-Sue -- if only the author can identify with her and enjoy her exploits (because the reactions feel "real" only to the one who wrote them?), she's a Sue. If everyone has that identification, then she's a heroine? (And now it's early enough for me to babble about the EverySue/Everyman conjunctions, and I'll toddle off now.)

No Fear! If it makes your toes curl, it'll probably make our toes curl just as happily.
[info]satyrs_grove wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 11:31 pm (UTC)
(Besides, Agatha has various scary pipples after her, and she's human, and she rants. I don't think good little Mary Sues are allowed to rant.)
Not-as-such. One of my pet-peeve Mary-Sue character (Anita Blake) rants constantly.

The thing is Anita didn't start out being a Mary-Sue(tm) character, well not until she got overpowered, hypocritical, and truely annoying to read about. I haven't read anything since Obsidian Butterfly (or maybe the book after that...)

Anywho, my point (and I do have one) is that there is a fine line between a Wish Fulfilment character and a Mary-Sue(tm). I think it basicly comes down to the question of: Does the character seem real to you. Agatha (from what I've read) is hardly what I would call a Mary-Sue(tm) mainly because she seems all-too-human in that she isn't the master of every situation, has flaws, weaknesses and even has those who are (gasp) better at what she does that she is.

So keep on writing and we'll keep on reading.

Just my 2 gil.
[info]baralier wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 12:09 pm (UTC)
I think there's a difference between a wish-fulfillment character and a Mary-Sue. Usually the Mary-Sue's writer re-jigs the primary characters so they start reacting to the Mary-Sue in rather uncharacteristic ways. That's usually why most people bag out the Mary-Sue character rather than a complete dislike for wish-fulfillment characters.
[info]chanlemur wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 12:42 pm (UTC)
Amen, I say, Amen! Shout it from the effing rooftops.
[info]kajafoglio wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 07:06 pm (UTC)
JAMES ERNEST IZ A VERRY SCMOT GUY!

Oh, wait, that might not be quite what you meant...
(no subject) - [info]chanlemur - Aug. 10th, 2005 07:52 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]koogrr wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 12:47 pm (UTC)
I agree, thanks! Not that I actually produce a whole lot, but several things have been auto-killed by my sneer reflex, and I've jealously seen others go on to do them.

Yes, I often wonder what it must be like to be James Ernest, doing things you enjoy and getting paid for them.
[info]mearn4d10 wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 01:37 pm (UTC)
Here, hear! Hyu go gurl!

Und Hy LUV de jagers. Vith lines like dis, Vo vouldn'?

"Oh, dot. You gots smekked by a piece ov de bridge. Yah, dat vos it. SEE?"
"I hitt Mr. Lars." (Syned) A Brick
[info]petronivs wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 01:52 pm (UTC)
As far as art goes, I have one simple criteria:

Art is something that I get something out of, even if it's something as simple as momentary pleasure.

As such, I'd emphatically qualify Girl Genius as art. I'd consider Vigilante to be art. Of course, I'd also qualify many ecchi works as art. (Does that cheapen GG? I hope not.)

Something that just makes me go, "Huh?" until someone explains it to me in a snooty accent? No, that's not art at all. Art is in the viewing, and is different things to different people.
[info]spotweld wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 02:24 pm (UTC)
Er.. just one small comment if I may.
On the topic of Mary-Sues. It's true that many good characters meet the general definition of a Mary-Sue (Wonder Woman, Emma Peel, heck, even Jane Eyre if you want to stretch things a bit), but I don't think anyone would call them un-readable. When you get down to it, Mary-Sues aren't dynamic. Through conflict and plot devices galore, they remain the same, which is why they grate on the nerves so.

In my humble reader's opinion, Agatha, as a character has grown and in certain ways re-written herself; a truly dynamic character. One a look forward to reading more of as the story progresses (hopefully for some time to come).
[info]agent_23 wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 02:41 pm (UTC)
He's a smart man, that James Ernest...
And a damn good poker player too. >=)

(Anonymous) wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 02:57 pm (UTC)
An English teacher once told me that it's fine to make your main character as smart and virtuous as you want, as long as he/she faces a lot of difficulties and suffering. The example she gave was Odysseus, who's nearly a superman, but always miserable.
[info]coherent wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 05:14 pm (UTC)
Hehe, I don't think you need to make a superman miserable. It depends on what kind of conflict you have in the story. If you're writing about interpersonal conflict, relationship drama, then it's okay to make your protagonist an engineering superwiz. Her gifts as an engineering superwiz don't help her overcome the central conflict, only secondary conflict, so she can get away with being a superman (superperson?) and still maintain a satisfying story arc.

Putting the screws on a supercharacter does work though. A very satisfying variant is to have roughly double story arcs where, in the satisfying anticlimax of one resolution, you suddenly up the ante on the secondary conflict and bring about some real fireworks as it climaxes as well.

It's sooo odd that talking about story structure so often sounds so very sexual... :)
(no subject) - [info]kajafoglio - Aug. 10th, 2005 07:13 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]martinhesselius wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 03:00 pm (UTC)

Woot! :)
[info]delazan wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 03:12 pm (UTC)
Amen, Sistah!
Amen! or Blessed Be! or whatever. I'm adding this to my "Advice on Writing" collection. BTW: have you ever read any Meg Cabot (The Princess Diaries, etc.)? I recommend her:
http://www.megcabot.com/

Also, did you check out the Naked Quidditch Match?
http://daisygrrl.com/quidditch/
-Lori
[info]kajafoglio wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 07:16 pm (UTC)
Re: Amen, Sistah!
I really enjoyed the Princess Diaries. (The books, not the movie where they sucked all the soul and attitude out of them, changed the story and moved everybody out of New York and into LA.) Great, funny books.

I fear the Naked Quidditch Match, but I'll have a peek after I read this week's Inuyasha. Eek!
Re: Amen, Sistah! - [info]jcfiala - Aug. 11th, 2005 03:07 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]lotsahair wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 03:17 pm (UTC)
yeay!
Believe it or not, I went to college. Yes, I did. Where I was taught that certain types of art are derivative and masturbatory and therefore unworthy

My question to you is....if you learned that in college...and its obviously not the correct way of doing things.....do you question what you've learned?

I read your posts every chance I get.....I enjoy all your work, and I think you should do whatever you want -- don't let anyone every say otherwise.

Do what YOU feel is right. I think everyone will be better off and you will be much much happier!
[info]kajafoglio wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 07:23 pm (UTC)
Re: yeay!
Do I question what I learned in college, or what I've learned since?

What I learned in college is clearly crap. I knew it then, and argued with my Professors a lot. But there's still that little voice deep inside that must be crushed. Weirdly, I don't hold other people to the same rules that I hold myself to. I never felt like sneering at other people's stuff, I buy loads of wish-fulfillment escapist fantasy and adore it. I always have. It's only the ideas I have myself that I look at and think "oh, that's so derivative and self-serving."

So it's mostly a question of giving myself permission to enjoy the stories I come up with without worrying "...will this rival Tolstoy?"
Re: yeay! - (Anonymous) - Aug. 11th, 2005 05:20 am (UTC) Expand
Re: yeay! - [info]leanne_opaskar - Aug. 12th, 2005 04:00 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]tashiro wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 03:51 pm (UTC)
Thought you might enjoy.
[info]doccross wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 03:52 pm (UTC)
Right on! Write for YOU and the rest of the world can like it or not.
[info]reapergirl wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 04:05 pm (UTC)
Reminds me of something Harlan Ellison once said (Or at least I think he was the one who said it, and I know I'm badly misquoting/paraphrasing)... Anyway, he said if you're not writing for yourself, you're writing for all the wrong reasons.
[info]docrailgun wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2005 04:36 pm (UTC)
Make what you want. We'll buy it. :)
[info]chaios_kity wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2005 03:22 pm (UTC)
I,who have also been to and am still in the hallowed halls of academia, have always enjoyed most those stories that were obviously written by someone who really loved what they were writing. I think the best reason in the world to write is that there is a story you want to read and no has been kind of enough to write it for you yet.
but hey thats just me.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>